Our aim was to compare the need for analgesics/drugs of abuse between headache patients—chronic and episodic headache sufferers—and addicts, by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ). This is a self-completion 10-item instrument to measure dependence upon a variety of substances. We administered the LDQ questionnaire to 122 chronic daily headache (CDH) sufferers who had been taking one dose of analgesic drug every day for at least 1 year; 71 subjects suffering from episodic headache (EH) using analgesics only occasionally; 115 consecutive drug addicts (DA) with a diagnosis of substance dependence. The mean LDQ total score was similar in the CDH (11.58 ± 6.35) and DA (10.37 ± 6.51) groups, and for both it was significantly higher than the score in the EH (5.61 ± 3.00) group (P < 0.001). The CDH group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the DA group (Z = -8.18, P < 0.001) in item 8, assessing the primacy of effect over the kind of analgesic used, and in item 10 (Z = -5.03, P < 0.001), asking if it is difficult to live without the analgesic; the DA group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the CDH group, in item 9 (Z = -5.07, P < 0.001) addressing the need for the continued administration of the drug to maintain well-being, and in item 3 (Z = -2.39, P < 0.05), exploring compulsion to start the use of the drug. The EH group had lower scores in all items (P < 0.05) except for item 9, where there was no difference from CDH group; the EH group had also lower scores (P < 0.001) than the DA group, except for item 8, where, instead, the score was higher than in the DA group (Z = -5.33, P < 0.001). A strong link develops between chronic headache patients and the analgesics they use. This sort of ‘dependence’ appears to be a consequence of headache, originating from the necessity for the analgesic to cope with everyday life.

NEED FOR ANALGESICS/DRUGS OF ABUSE: A COMPARISON BETWEEN HEADACHE PATIENTS AND ADDICTS BY THE LEEDS DEPENDENCE QUESTIONNAIRE (LDQ).

LEONE, Sheila;
2006-01-01

Abstract

Our aim was to compare the need for analgesics/drugs of abuse between headache patients—chronic and episodic headache sufferers—and addicts, by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ). This is a self-completion 10-item instrument to measure dependence upon a variety of substances. We administered the LDQ questionnaire to 122 chronic daily headache (CDH) sufferers who had been taking one dose of analgesic drug every day for at least 1 year; 71 subjects suffering from episodic headache (EH) using analgesics only occasionally; 115 consecutive drug addicts (DA) with a diagnosis of substance dependence. The mean LDQ total score was similar in the CDH (11.58 ± 6.35) and DA (10.37 ± 6.51) groups, and for both it was significantly higher than the score in the EH (5.61 ± 3.00) group (P < 0.001). The CDH group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the DA group (Z = -8.18, P < 0.001) in item 8, assessing the primacy of effect over the kind of analgesic used, and in item 10 (Z = -5.03, P < 0.001), asking if it is difficult to live without the analgesic; the DA group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the CDH group, in item 9 (Z = -5.07, P < 0.001) addressing the need for the continued administration of the drug to maintain well-being, and in item 3 (Z = -2.39, P < 0.05), exploring compulsion to start the use of the drug. The EH group had lower scores in all items (P < 0.05) except for item 9, where there was no difference from CDH group; the EH group had also lower scores (P < 0.001) than the DA group, except for item 8, where, instead, the score was higher than in the DA group (Z = -5.33, P < 0.001). A strong link develops between chronic headache patients and the analgesics they use. This sort of ‘dependence’ appears to be a consequence of headache, originating from the necessity for the analgesic to cope with everyday life.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/109750
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 43
social impact