INTRODUCTION: It is not clear if and how international guidelines on the management of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are translated in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted among different specialists who treat DIC. The survey examined six hypothetical case scenarios including the diagnosis of DIC, the treatment of non-overt and overt DIC with or without thrombosis, and the management of DIC patients at risk of bleeding or actively bleeding. RESULTS: There were 191 respondents and 73 returned complete questionnaires. Most of respondents were specialists in hematology (48%) or intensive care (30%). In suspected overt or non-overt DIC, only one third use formal diagnostic scores while two thirds rely on a broad panel of coagulation tests independently of any score. In non-overt DIC, 68% provide no treatment, but monitor laboratory tests. Monitoring was considered by 48% of respondents in overt DIC without thrombosis or bleeding. When a thrombotic or bleeding complication ensues, 29% consider intervening only if the event is major. In DIC patients judged at risk of bleeding, 67% use prophylactic transfusions, mostly fresh-frozen plasma (73%) and platelets (65%). Active bleeding is often managed with fresh-frozen plasma (83%) and platelet transfusions (68%) as first line and recombinant activated factor VII (31%) as second line treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This survey shows a largely heterogeneous approach of clinicians to the diagnosis and management of DIC. There is limited use of diagnostic scores despite guidelines' recommendations. The prevalent attitude seems monitoring DIC and limiting treatment to the underlying disease, unless thrombosis or bleeding develop, but modalities varied considerably.

Management of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A survey of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

DI NISIO, Marcello;
2015-01-01

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is not clear if and how international guidelines on the management of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are translated in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted among different specialists who treat DIC. The survey examined six hypothetical case scenarios including the diagnosis of DIC, the treatment of non-overt and overt DIC with or without thrombosis, and the management of DIC patients at risk of bleeding or actively bleeding. RESULTS: There were 191 respondents and 73 returned complete questionnaires. Most of respondents were specialists in hematology (48%) or intensive care (30%). In suspected overt or non-overt DIC, only one third use formal diagnostic scores while two thirds rely on a broad panel of coagulation tests independently of any score. In non-overt DIC, 68% provide no treatment, but monitor laboratory tests. Monitoring was considered by 48% of respondents in overt DIC without thrombosis or bleeding. When a thrombotic or bleeding complication ensues, 29% consider intervening only if the event is major. In DIC patients judged at risk of bleeding, 67% use prophylactic transfusions, mostly fresh-frozen plasma (73%) and platelets (65%). Active bleeding is often managed with fresh-frozen plasma (83%) and platelet transfusions (68%) as first line and recombinant activated factor VII (31%) as second line treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This survey shows a largely heterogeneous approach of clinicians to the diagnosis and management of DIC. There is limited use of diagnostic scores despite guidelines' recommendations. The prevalent attitude seems monitoring DIC and limiting treatment to the underlying disease, unless thrombosis or bleeding develop, but modalities varied considerably.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2015-DiNisio-ThRes2015.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Dimensione 213.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
213.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/668604
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact