In this paper, the model of coherent upper and lower conditional previsions is proposed to represent preference orderings and equivalences between random variables that human beings consider consciously or unconsciously when making decisions. To solve the contradiction, Linda’s Problem (i.e., conjunction fallacy) is re-interpreted in terms of the probabilistic model based on coherent upper and lower conditional probabilities. Main insights of this mathematical solution for modeling decisions in AI are evidenced accordingly.

Modelings decisions in AI:re-thinkning Linda in terms of coherent lower and upper conditional previsions

Doria S.
;
2020-01-01

Abstract

In this paper, the model of coherent upper and lower conditional previsions is proposed to represent preference orderings and equivalences between random variables that human beings consider consciously or unconsciously when making decisions. To solve the contradiction, Linda’s Problem (i.e., conjunction fallacy) is re-interpreted in terms of the probabilistic model based on coherent upper and lower conditional probabilities. Main insights of this mathematical solution for modeling decisions in AI are evidenced accordingly.
2020
Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence
Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Nin, J., Agell, N. Eds
Inglese
ELETTRONICO
41
52
12
Springer
GERMANIA
Coherent upper and lower conditional previsions · Linda’s Problem · Human decision making · Conscious and unconscious thought
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-57524-3_4
2 Contributo in Volume::2.1 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio)
2
268
reserved
Doria, S.; Cenci, A.
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MDAI 2020.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 182.66 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
182.66 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/726741
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact