While academic literature related to sustainability assessment approaches in circular inter-firm networks continues to grow, little is known about the implementation and applicability of these approaches by industry practitioners across their supply chains. This chapter therefore compares the proposed approaches from the literature with those applied in practice according to four criteria: balance of sustainability dimensions; the intergenerational nature of sustainability; stakeholder involvement; and life-cycle thinking. Empirical data was collected through 43 semi-structured interviews with companies engaged in CE practices in Italy and the Netherlands. It was found that CE actors saw sustainable supply chains as a priority, even though about a third of the respondents did not conduct sustainability assessments across supply chains. The main reasons for this were the small size of companies or, for larger companies, the limited importance clients attributed to the sustainability impacts of products. The supply chain assessments conducted were mostly qualitative, in collaboration with firms’ supply chain partners, or a life cycle assessment. It further emerged that, rather than relying on the assessment results, companies ascribed high importance to supply chain management tools and to a relationship based on trust with their supply chain partners.

Assessing sustainability across circular inter-firm networks: Insights from academia and practice

Walker, Anna M.
;
Simboli, Alberto;Raggi, Andrea
2022-01-01

Abstract

While academic literature related to sustainability assessment approaches in circular inter-firm networks continues to grow, little is known about the implementation and applicability of these approaches by industry practitioners across their supply chains. This chapter therefore compares the proposed approaches from the literature with those applied in practice according to four criteria: balance of sustainability dimensions; the intergenerational nature of sustainability; stakeholder involvement; and life-cycle thinking. Empirical data was collected through 43 semi-structured interviews with companies engaged in CE practices in Italy and the Netherlands. It was found that CE actors saw sustainable supply chains as a priority, even though about a third of the respondents did not conduct sustainability assessments across supply chains. The main reasons for this were the small size of companies or, for larger companies, the limited importance clients attributed to the sustainability impacts of products. The supply chain assessments conducted were mostly qualitative, in collaboration with firms’ supply chain partners, or a life cycle assessment. It further emerged that, rather than relying on the assessment results, companies ascribed high importance to supply chain management tools and to a relationship based on trust with their supply chain partners.
2022
9781003179788
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
C10_accepted manuscript.pdf

Open Access dal 02/10/2023

Descrizione: Accepted manuscript
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Dimensione 329.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
329.85 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/773600
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact