In this collection of articles different disciplines – anthropology, psychoanalysis, philosophy, law, history of political thought, oral history and historiography – reflect upon epistemic questions – in terms of content, methodology and horizon of sense – emerging from the use of the concept of recognition. The aim of the volume is to highlight the way in which alterity cannot be reduced to a mere object of recognition but compels disciplines to continuously reposition themselves in relation to their own theoretical foundations.
Il due in questione. Prospettive interdisciplinari sul riconoscimento
Matteo Cavalleri
2020-01-01
Abstract
In this collection of articles different disciplines – anthropology, psychoanalysis, philosophy, law, history of political thought, oral history and historiography – reflect upon epistemic questions – in terms of content, methodology and horizon of sense – emerging from the use of the concept of recognition. The aim of the volume is to highlight the way in which alterity cannot be reduced to a mere object of recognition but compels disciplines to continuously reposition themselves in relation to their own theoretical foundations.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cavalleri_Il due in questione_Prospettive interdisciplinari sul riconoscimento_Quad 9 2020 SP DEF_novembre.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
1.25 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.25 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


