This chapter critically engages with dominant paradigms in AI ethics, which often rely on liberal notions of agency, responsibility, and autonomy rooted in rational individualism. Drawing on feminist theories—particularly the concept of relational autonomy—autonomy is redefined as a socially embedded, affective, and interdependent capacity. This chapter argues that mainstream AI ethics fails to account for structural injustices, material conditions, and the relational constitution of subjectivity, and therefore cannot adequately address the challenges raised by algorithmic governance and technosocial systems. Through the lens of relational autonomy, this chapter reframes the ethical debate around AI to highlight care, collective responsibility, and participatory design practices. Case studies and the critical analyses of sex robots, algorithmic subjectivity, and techno-affects underscore the performative and political nature of AI systems. In conclusion, this chapter calls for a feminist ethics of AI capable of confronting the ontological, affective, and political dimensions of technological design, and proposes democratic, community-based approaches as a path toward justice-oriented and pluralistic technological futures.

Relational Autonomy. Rethinking AI Ethics in the Light of Feminism

Achella, S
2025-01-01

Abstract

This chapter critically engages with dominant paradigms in AI ethics, which often rely on liberal notions of agency, responsibility, and autonomy rooted in rational individualism. Drawing on feminist theories—particularly the concept of relational autonomy—autonomy is redefined as a socially embedded, affective, and interdependent capacity. This chapter argues that mainstream AI ethics fails to account for structural injustices, material conditions, and the relational constitution of subjectivity, and therefore cannot adequately address the challenges raised by algorithmic governance and technosocial systems. Through the lens of relational autonomy, this chapter reframes the ethical debate around AI to highlight care, collective responsibility, and participatory design practices. Case studies and the critical analyses of sex robots, algorithmic subjectivity, and techno-affects underscore the performative and political nature of AI systems. In conclusion, this chapter calls for a feminist ethics of AI capable of confronting the ontological, affective, and political dimensions of technological design, and proposes democratic, community-based approaches as a path toward justice-oriented and pluralistic technological futures.
2025
Reconfiguring Human Autonomy
Achella S., Anzalone M., Battaglia F., Donise A.
Inglese
STAMPA
17
33
17
978-3-032-14536-9
Springer
Cham
SVIZZERA
AI, Feminism, Relational Autonomy, Ethics
Goal 4: Quality education
Goal 5: Gender equality
no
2 Contributo in Volume::2.1 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio)
1
268
none
Achella, S
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
   Digital transition and human values
   Digit-Human
   M.U.R. - Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
   P2022X5MSS
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/877522
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact