Early breast cancer presents with a remarkable heterogeneity of outcomes. Undetected, microscopic lymph node tumor deposits may account for a significant fraction of this prognostic diversity. Thus, we systematically evaluated the presence of lymph node tumor cell deposits <= 0.2 mm in diameter [pN(o(i+)), nanometastases] and analyzed their prognostic effect.Experimental Design: Single-institution, consecutive patients with 8 years of median follow-up (n = 702) were studied. To maximize chances of detecting micrometastases and nanometastases, whole-axilla dissections were analyzed. pN(0) cases (n = 377) were systematically reevaluated by lymph node (n = 6676) step-sectioning and anticytokeratin immunohistochemical analysis. The risk of first adverse events and of distant relapse of bona fide pN(0) patients was compared with that of pN(0(i+)), pN(1mi), and pN(1) cases.Results: Minimal lymph node deposits were revealed in 13% of pN(0) patients. The hazard ratio for all adverse events of pN(o(i+)) versus pN(o(i-)) was 2.51 (P = 0.00019). Hazards of pN(1mi) and pN(o(i+)) cases were not significantly different. A multivariate Cox model showed a hazard ratio of 2.16 for grouped pN(o(i+))/pN(1mi) versus pN(o(i-)) (P = 0.0005). Crude cumulative incidence curves for metastatic relapse were also significantly different (Gray's test chi(2) = 5.54, P = 0.019).Conclusion: Nanometastases are a strong risk factor for disease-free survival and for metastatic relapse. These findings support the inclusion of procedures for nanometastasis detection in tumor-node-metastasis staging.
Axillary Lymph Node Nanometastases are Prognostic Factors for Disease-Free Survival and Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer Patients
PIANTELLI, Mauro;IACOBELLI, Stefano;
2006-01-01
Abstract
Early breast cancer presents with a remarkable heterogeneity of outcomes. Undetected, microscopic lymph node tumor deposits may account for a significant fraction of this prognostic diversity. Thus, we systematically evaluated the presence of lymph node tumor cell deposits <= 0.2 mm in diameter [pN(o(i+)), nanometastases] and analyzed their prognostic effect.Experimental Design: Single-institution, consecutive patients with 8 years of median follow-up (n = 702) were studied. To maximize chances of detecting micrometastases and nanometastases, whole-axilla dissections were analyzed. pN(0) cases (n = 377) were systematically reevaluated by lymph node (n = 6676) step-sectioning and anticytokeratin immunohistochemical analysis. The risk of first adverse events and of distant relapse of bona fide pN(0) patients was compared with that of pN(0(i+)), pN(1mi), and pN(1) cases.Results: Minimal lymph node deposits were revealed in 13% of pN(0) patients. The hazard ratio for all adverse events of pN(o(i+)) versus pN(o(i-)) was 2.51 (P = 0.00019). Hazards of pN(1mi) and pN(o(i+)) cases were not significantly different. A multivariate Cox model showed a hazard ratio of 2.16 for grouped pN(o(i+))/pN(1mi) versus pN(o(i-)) (P = 0.0005). Crude cumulative incidence curves for metastatic relapse were also significantly different (Gray's test chi(2) = 5.54, P = 0.019).Conclusion: Nanometastases are a strong risk factor for disease-free survival and for metastatic relapse. These findings support the inclusion of procedures for nanometastasis detection in tumor-node-metastasis staging.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.