A new model of achromatic transparency has been recently proposed by Singh and Anderson as an alternative to the model proposed long ago by Metelli. The study reported here compared these models using achromatic stimuli consisting of a transparent disk on a background formed by two adjoining rectangles, with the common border of the rectangles dividing the disk in half. Let a and b denote the luminances of the left and right parts of the background, respectively, and let p and q denote the luminances of the left and right parts of the disk, respectively. The value of b was varied for fixed values of a, p and q. for these values the Singh-anderson model predicts that the perceived extent of transparency T of the disk is constant with b, while Metelli’s model predicts that T decreases as b increases. Participants rated T. The results confirm the prediction of Metelli’s model. It is also shown that the Singh-Anderson model is invalid in principle in that, unlike Metelli’s model, it fails to capture the principle of independence of the effects of a, b, p and q on T.

Test of the Singh-Anderson model of transparency

TOMMASI, Marco;
2007-01-01

Abstract

A new model of achromatic transparency has been recently proposed by Singh and Anderson as an alternative to the model proposed long ago by Metelli. The study reported here compared these models using achromatic stimuli consisting of a transparent disk on a background formed by two adjoining rectangles, with the common border of the rectangles dividing the disk in half. Let a and b denote the luminances of the left and right parts of the background, respectively, and let p and q denote the luminances of the left and right parts of the disk, respectively. The value of b was varied for fixed values of a, p and q. for these values the Singh-anderson model predicts that the perceived extent of transparency T of the disk is constant with b, while Metelli’s model predicts that T decreases as b increases. Participants rated T. The results confirm the prediction of Metelli’s model. It is also shown that the Singh-Anderson model is invalid in principle in that, unlike Metelli’s model, it fails to capture the principle of independence of the effects of a, b, p and q on T.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/132192
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact