The present study focused on functional coupling between human bilateral auditory cortices and on possible influence of right over left auditory cortex during dichotic listening of complex non-verbal tones having near (competing) compared with distant non-competing fundamental frequencies. It was hypothesized that dichotic stimulation with competing tones would induce a decline of functional coupling between the two auditory cortices, as revealed by a decrease of electroencephalography coherence and an increase of directed transfer function from right (specialized for the present stimulus material) to left auditory cortex. Electroencephalograph was recorded from T3 and T4 scalp sites, overlying respectively left and right auditory cortices, and from Cz scalp site (vertex) for control purposes. Event-related coherence between T3 and T4 scalp sites was significantly lower for all electroencephalography bands of interest during dichotic listening of competing than non-competing tone pairs. This was a specific effect, since event-related coherence did not differ in a monotic control condition. Furthermore, event-related coherence between T3 and Cz and between T4 and Cz scalp sites showed no significant effects. Conversely, the directed transfer function results showed negligible influence at group level of right over left auditory cortex during dichotic listening. These results suggest a decrease of functional coupling between bilateral auditory cortices during competing dichotic stimuli as a possible neural substrate for the lateralization of auditory stimuli during dichotic listening.

Decrease of functional coupling between left and right auditory cortices during dichotic listening: an electroencephalography study.

BRANCUCCI, Alfredo;ROMANI, Gian Luca;
2005-01-01

Abstract

The present study focused on functional coupling between human bilateral auditory cortices and on possible influence of right over left auditory cortex during dichotic listening of complex non-verbal tones having near (competing) compared with distant non-competing fundamental frequencies. It was hypothesized that dichotic stimulation with competing tones would induce a decline of functional coupling between the two auditory cortices, as revealed by a decrease of electroencephalography coherence and an increase of directed transfer function from right (specialized for the present stimulus material) to left auditory cortex. Electroencephalograph was recorded from T3 and T4 scalp sites, overlying respectively left and right auditory cortices, and from Cz scalp site (vertex) for control purposes. Event-related coherence between T3 and T4 scalp sites was significantly lower for all electroencephalography bands of interest during dichotic listening of competing than non-competing tone pairs. This was a specific effect, since event-related coherence did not differ in a monotic control condition. Furthermore, event-related coherence between T3 and Cz and between T4 and Cz scalp sites showed no significant effects. Conversely, the directed transfer function results showed negligible influence at group level of right over left auditory cortex during dichotic listening. These results suggest a decrease of functional coupling between bilateral auditory cortices during competing dichotic stimuli as a possible neural substrate for the lateralization of auditory stimuli during dichotic listening.
2005
Inglese
136(1)
323
332
10
8
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Brancucci, Alfredo; Babiloni, C; Vecchio, F; Galderisi, S; Mucci, A; Tecchio, F; Romani, Gian Luca; Rossini, Pm
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
open
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2005-Neuroscience.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 376.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
376.53 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/141384
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact