On-line HFR and removal of uremic toxins inducing the loss of phospholipidic asymmetry of the erythrocyte membrane [HFR on-line e rimozione di tossine uremiche inducenti la perdita dell'asimmetria fosfolipidica della membrana eritrocitaria.]

The phospholipids of the erythrocyte membrane are normally distributed asymmetrically in the double layer with the aminophospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS) present only on the inside of the membrane, since its exposure on the outside has numerous physiopathological consequences. In previous studies we have observed that solutes retained in uremia cause increased exposure of PS on the outer surfaces of the erythrocyte membrane and that this phenomenon may be involved in the uremic physiopathology, reducing erythrocyte survival and encouraging abnormal erythrocyte-endothelium interactions. The capability of the extracorporeal blood clearance treatment in removing the circulating uremic factors, responsible for the increased exposure of PS in red blood cells (RBC), was evaluated in 6 chronic uremic patients treated with haemodialysis (HD) or with on-line HFR in a random cross-over perspective study. The PS removal was evaluated indirectly by measuring the expression of PS in normal RBC incubated with uremic plasma obtained at various moments of the clearance session. The capability of the uremic plasma to expose PS on the RBC of healthy subjects (n-times increase compared to incubation of normal RBC with autologous plasma) was essentially unmodified during HD (3.3 +/- 0.2 pre HD; 3.3 +/- 0.1 after 2 hours; 3.1 +/- 0.2 at the end of the session) but was reduced during HFR (3.1 +/- 0.2 pre HD; 2.3 +/- 0.1 after 2 hours; 1.6 +/- 0.1 at the end of dialysis; p<0.001 at the end of dialysis vs pre and after 2 hours and p<0.001 vs HD at 2 hours and at the end of the session). The reduced capability of the uremic plasma obtained during the HFR session to expose PS in normal RBC, proves removal of the plasmatic uremic factors able to externalize the PS. To assess whether this removal effect is linked to the cartridge containing styrene resin used in the treatment with HFR, samples of ultrafiltrate were taken before and after the cartridge and its capability to express PS on normal RBC was measured. The absolute RBC values expressing PS (%) were (pre-cartridge vs post-cartridge) 8.6 +/- 0.3 vs 3.8 +/- 0.2 after 5 minutes from the start of the session; 3.9 +0.1 vs 1.6 +0.2 halfway through the session; 3.1 +/- 0.1 vs 1.3 +/- 0.66 at the end of the session (p<0.005 pre vs post at all times). Our results show that uremic compounds able to cause increased exposure of PS in RBC can be removed during on-line HFR, mainly thanks to the adsorption properties of the cartridge containing resin. This removal might be of benefit to uremic patients, improving the anaemic condition and reducing abnormal RBC-endothelium interactions which may contribute to endothelial disorder during uremia.