Purpose: This study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided Hartmann's solution enema (US-E) and radiological liquid enema (RX-E) in reducing idiopathic ileocecocolic intussusceptions in relation to patient age and symptom duration. Materials and methods: The study group consisted of 42 patients with idiopathic ileocecocolic intussusception treated with US-E (20 patients) or RX-E (23 patients), with one patient undergoing both procedures owing to recurrence. Patients were divided into subgroups according to age (<6 months, 6-12 months, >12 months) and symptom duration (<12 h, 12-24 h, >24 h). Results: Complete reduction was achieved in 15/20 patients treated with US-E (75%) and in 10/23 treated with RX-E (43.5%) (p=ns). Recurrence was observed in 1/20 US-E and 0/23 RX-E (p=ns) patients. No complications were encountered. US-E had a significantly higher success rate than RX-E in patients >12 months (p=0.0063) and with symptom duration >24 h (p=0.0361). No differences were found in the other subgroups (p=ns). Conclusions: US-E and RX-E are procedures of comparable value and safety in reducing idiopathic intussusception. US-E seems to be more effective in patients >12 months or with symptom duration >24 h. As US-E avoids radiation exposure, it should be considered the first-choice procedure for reducing idiopathic ileocecocolic intussusception, particularly in these two subgroups of patients.

Ultrasound-guided Hartmann's solution enema: first-choice procedure for reducing idiopathic intussusception [Clisma eco-guidato con soluzione di Hartmann: procedura di prima scelta nella riduzione dell'invaginazione idiopatica]

DI RENZO, DACIA
Primo
;
COLANGELO, MAURIZIA
Secondo
;
LAURITI, GIUSEPPE;DE GIROLAMO, FABIANA;LELLI CHIESA, Pierluigi
Ultimo
2012-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: This study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided Hartmann's solution enema (US-E) and radiological liquid enema (RX-E) in reducing idiopathic ileocecocolic intussusceptions in relation to patient age and symptom duration. Materials and methods: The study group consisted of 42 patients with idiopathic ileocecocolic intussusception treated with US-E (20 patients) or RX-E (23 patients), with one patient undergoing both procedures owing to recurrence. Patients were divided into subgroups according to age (<6 months, 6-12 months, >12 months) and symptom duration (<12 h, 12-24 h, >24 h). Results: Complete reduction was achieved in 15/20 patients treated with US-E (75%) and in 10/23 treated with RX-E (43.5%) (p=ns). Recurrence was observed in 1/20 US-E and 0/23 RX-E (p=ns) patients. No complications were encountered. US-E had a significantly higher success rate than RX-E in patients >12 months (p=0.0063) and with symptom duration >24 h (p=0.0361). No differences were found in the other subgroups (p=ns). Conclusions: US-E and RX-E are procedures of comparable value and safety in reducing idiopathic intussusception. US-E seems to be more effective in patients >12 months or with symptom duration >24 h. As US-E avoids radiation exposure, it should be considered the first-choice procedure for reducing idiopathic ileocecocolic intussusception, particularly in these two subgroups of patients.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Renzo2012_Article_Ultrasound-guidedHartmannSSolu.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 373.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
373.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/235582
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact