Three judges of a German tribunal, a 'Schöffengericht' consisting of a professional judge and two lay judges, are deliberating on the sentences for three defendants. The resulting sentences are caused by the 'voting paradox', a phenomenon that is hotly debated in economics, politics, and philosophy, but not widely discussed in German jurisprudence.

Il paradosso del voto nella quotidianità del diritto

ROMEO, FRANCESCO
2006

Abstract

Three judges of a German tribunal, a 'Schöffengericht' consisting of a professional judge and two lay judges, are deliberating on the sentences for three defendants. The resulting sentences are caused by the 'voting paradox', a phenomenon that is hotly debated in economics, politics, and philosophy, but not widely discussed in German jurisprudence.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/274154
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact