Three judges of a German tribunal, a 'Schöffengericht' consisting of a professional judge and two lay judges, are deliberating on the sentences for three defendants. The resulting sentences are caused by the 'voting paradox', a phenomenon that is hotly debated in economics, politics, and philosophy, but not widely discussed in German jurisprudence.
Il paradosso del voto nella quotidianità del diritto
ROMEO, FRANCESCO
2006-01-01
Abstract
Three judges of a German tribunal, a 'Schöffengericht' consisting of a professional judge and two lay judges, are deliberating on the sentences for three defendants. The resulting sentences are caused by the 'voting paradox', a phenomenon that is hotly debated in economics, politics, and philosophy, but not widely discussed in German jurisprudence.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
