Network Governance, widely used as theoretical model in investigations on social housing, is not free from critiques, first of all, for the fact that it has a uni-directionality of bottom-up processes, when oriented to public deliberation, or top-down when decision-makers are technical experts at the political level. The contribution given by this work is the proposition of what has been called “Fluent Governance" as a framework of decision making, able to represent the whole spectrum of interventions in the process, also taking into account aspects not captured by standard models. The paper reports an experimentation of the proposed model conducted in Italy in the field of renovating social housing policy.
For a Still “Social" Housing: The Fluent Governance
VENDITTI, Michelina;ANTONUCCI, GIANLUCA;PASOTTI, Camillo Stefano;DI ZIO, Simone
2015-01-01
Abstract
Network Governance, widely used as theoretical model in investigations on social housing, is not free from critiques, first of all, for the fact that it has a uni-directionality of bottom-up processes, when oriented to public deliberation, or top-down when decision-makers are technical experts at the political level. The contribution given by this work is the proposition of what has been called “Fluent Governance" as a framework of decision making, able to represent the whole spectrum of interventions in the process, also taking into account aspects not captured by standard models. The paper reports an experimentation of the proposed model conducted in Italy in the field of renovating social housing policy.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
