URPOSE: The aim of this multicenter human clinical trial was to radiographically evaluate the marginal bone loss and to assess implant survival rate in patients treated using 2 different implant systems (Bio-Plant and Tuber-Plant) after 10 years of loading. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients were selected, and 160 implants were inserted (72 Bio-Plant and 88 Tuber-Plant). Ten years later, 20 patients were lost at follow-up and 77 patients (126 implants; 67 Bio-Plant and 59 Tuber-Plant) were recalled. After 10-year, the periimplant bone resorption was significantly lower (P = 0.0039) for Tuber-Plant (0.74 ± 0.12 mm) than for Bio-Plant (1.31 ± 0.09 mm). The cumulative survival rate was 99.11%.

Radiographic Comparison of Periimplant Bone Resorption and Assessment of Survival Rates of 2 Implant Systems: A 10-Year Prospective Multicenter Study

PERROTTI, Vittoria;PIATTELLI, Adriano;IEZZI, GIOVANNA
2015-01-01

Abstract

URPOSE: The aim of this multicenter human clinical trial was to radiographically evaluate the marginal bone loss and to assess implant survival rate in patients treated using 2 different implant systems (Bio-Plant and Tuber-Plant) after 10 years of loading. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients were selected, and 160 implants were inserted (72 Bio-Plant and 88 Tuber-Plant). Ten years later, 20 patients were lost at follow-up and 77 patients (126 implants; 67 Bio-Plant and 59 Tuber-Plant) were recalled. After 10-year, the periimplant bone resorption was significantly lower (P = 0.0039) for Tuber-Plant (0.74 ± 0.12 mm) than for Bio-Plant (1.31 ± 0.09 mm). The cumulative survival rate was 99.11%.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2015 perrotti et al. IMPLANT DENT.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Dimensione 321.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
321.88 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/641343
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact