Purpose: The presence of a microgap between implant and abutment could produce a bacterial reservoir which could interfere with the long-term health of the periimplant tissues. The aim of this article was to evaluate, by x-ray 3-dimensional microtomography, implant-abutment contact surfaces and microgaps at the implant-abutment interface in different types of implant-abutment connections. Materials and methods: A total of 40 implants were used in this in vitro study. Ten implants presented a screw-retained internal hexagon abutment (group I), 10 had a Morse Cone taper internal connection (group II), 10 another type of Morse Cone taper internal connection (group III), and 10 had a screwed trilobed connection (group IV). Results: In both types of Morse Cone internal connections, there was no detectable separation at the implant-abutment in the area of the conical connection, and there was an absolute congruity without any microgaps between abutment and implant. No line was visible separating the implant and the abutment. On the contrary, in the screwed abutment implants, numerous gaps and voids were present. Conclusions: The results of this study support the hypothesis that different types of implant-abutment joints are responsible for the observed differences in bacterial penetration.
Implant-Abutment Contact Surfaces and Microgap Measurements of Different Implant Connections Under 3-Dimensional X-Ray Microtomography
SCARANO, Antonio
;PIATTELLI, Adriano;PERROTTI, Vittoria
2016-01-01
Abstract
Purpose: The presence of a microgap between implant and abutment could produce a bacterial reservoir which could interfere with the long-term health of the periimplant tissues. The aim of this article was to evaluate, by x-ray 3-dimensional microtomography, implant-abutment contact surfaces and microgaps at the implant-abutment interface in different types of implant-abutment connections. Materials and methods: A total of 40 implants were used in this in vitro study. Ten implants presented a screw-retained internal hexagon abutment (group I), 10 had a Morse Cone taper internal connection (group II), 10 another type of Morse Cone taper internal connection (group III), and 10 had a screwed trilobed connection (group IV). Results: In both types of Morse Cone internal connections, there was no detectable separation at the implant-abutment in the area of the conical connection, and there was an absolute congruity without any microgaps between abutment and implant. No line was visible separating the implant and the abutment. On the contrary, in the screwed abutment implants, numerous gaps and voids were present. Conclusions: The results of this study support the hypothesis that different types of implant-abutment joints are responsible for the observed differences in bacterial penetration.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Implant-Abutment Contact Surfaces and Microgap.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Dimensione
947.87 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
947.87 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
POST-PRINT_IMPLDENT2016.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Dimensione
1.54 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.54 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.