PURPOSE: To use immunohistochemical staining to evaluate corneal inflammation and apoptosis induced after femtosecond laser incisions or manual incisions. SETTING: Ophthalmology Clinic, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Ninety human cadaver corneas were cut manually or with the femtosecond laser at different energies and analyzed by immunohistochemistry after 5 minutes or 4 hours. The corneas were divided into 5 groups: untreated (Group 1), cut manually (Group 2), and treated with the femtosecond laser with increasing energies (Groups 3 to 5; 3.0 μJ, 6.0 μJ, and 15.0 μJ, respectively). RESULTS: At 5 minutes, increased expression of interleukin (IL)-18 was observed in the femtosecond laser groups compared with the manual group (P < .01). Interferon gamma (IFNγ) positivity was significantly higher in Groups 4 and 5 than in Group 2 and between Groups 3 and 4 (P < .05). The terminal uridine deoxynucleotidyl nick end-labeling (TUNEL) positivity increased with higher energy (Group 2 versus Group 4 and Group 2 versus Group 5; P < .05). After 4 hours, IFNγ positivity was higher in Group 5 than in Group 2 (P = .0021) and between Group 5 and Groups 3 and 4 (P < .05). No sign of IL-18 positivity was found after 4 hours in any sample. Group 5 showed significant higher TUNEL positivity than all other groups (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The femtosecond laser technique at high energies induced a higher corneal inflammatory response and a higher corneal cell apoptosis than the manual technique. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Immunohistochemical study of corneal inflammation after femtosecond laser clear corneal incisions or manual surgery

TOTO, LISA;CURCIO, CLAUDIA;MASTROPASQUA, ALESSANDRA;MATTEI, PETER ANGELO;D'UGO, ERMINIA;MASTROPASQUA, Leonardo
2016-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use immunohistochemical staining to evaluate corneal inflammation and apoptosis induced after femtosecond laser incisions or manual incisions. SETTING: Ophthalmology Clinic, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Ninety human cadaver corneas were cut manually or with the femtosecond laser at different energies and analyzed by immunohistochemistry after 5 minutes or 4 hours. The corneas were divided into 5 groups: untreated (Group 1), cut manually (Group 2), and treated with the femtosecond laser with increasing energies (Groups 3 to 5; 3.0 μJ, 6.0 μJ, and 15.0 μJ, respectively). RESULTS: At 5 minutes, increased expression of interleukin (IL)-18 was observed in the femtosecond laser groups compared with the manual group (P < .01). Interferon gamma (IFNγ) positivity was significantly higher in Groups 4 and 5 than in Group 2 and between Groups 3 and 4 (P < .05). The terminal uridine deoxynucleotidyl nick end-labeling (TUNEL) positivity increased with higher energy (Group 2 versus Group 4 and Group 2 versus Group 5; P < .05). After 4 hours, IFNγ positivity was higher in Group 5 than in Group 2 (P = .0021) and between Group 5 and Groups 3 and 4 (P < .05). No sign of IL-18 positivity was found after 4 hours in any sample. Group 5 showed significant higher TUNEL positivity than all other groups (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The femtosecond laser technique at high energies induced a higher corneal inflammatory response and a higher corneal cell apoptosis than the manual technique. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JCRS_in press.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Dimensione 4.67 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.67 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/661325
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact