The informative power of financial reports is unanimously based, among others, on substance over form principle. But this principle is not free of ambiguous interpretation and adoption. In fact, it has been differently issued in the US GAAP, in the IAS/IFRS framework and in the Italian GAAP. This paper aims to provide a deep review of the recent reforms of Italian accounting regulation which introduced in 2003 and reaffirmed in 2015 the substance over form as an accounting principle within the law at the same level of accrual basis, prudence and going concern. We adopt a comparative approach to show how US GAAP, IFRS, UK GAAP already include substance over form principle and that the inclusion of this principle within the Italian law did not achieve its initial purpose. This is mainly due to the traditional legal view of a financial report intended by Italian legislator as a legal claim. Further research should be addressed in order to provide also empirical evidence of this mismatch.
Evolution of the substance over form principle in the Italian GAAP from a comparative and international perspective
DE LUCA, Francesco
;DI BERARDINO, DANIELA
2017-01-01
Abstract
The informative power of financial reports is unanimously based, among others, on substance over form principle. But this principle is not free of ambiguous interpretation and adoption. In fact, it has been differently issued in the US GAAP, in the IAS/IFRS framework and in the Italian GAAP. This paper aims to provide a deep review of the recent reforms of Italian accounting regulation which introduced in 2003 and reaffirmed in 2015 the substance over form as an accounting principle within the law at the same level of accrual basis, prudence and going concern. We adopt a comparative approach to show how US GAAP, IFRS, UK GAAP already include substance over form principle and that the inclusion of this principle within the Italian law did not achieve its initial purpose. This is mainly due to the traditional legal view of a financial report intended by Italian legislator as a legal claim. Further research should be addressed in order to provide also empirical evidence of this mismatch.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
IJCA090403 DE LUCA full published.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Dimensione
574.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
574.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
FINAL PROOF DE LUCA to publish.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Dimensione
271.5 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
271.5 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.