Natural products are gaining much momentum worldwide because they have a broad spectrum of biological effects and present excellent opportunities for bioproducts development. With this fact, this study has been designed to investigate for the first time the effects of the ethyl acetate (EA), methanolic (MeOH), and water (W) extracts of Lotus aegaeus (La) and Iberis sempervirens (Is) on key enzymes as well as to quantify antioxidant capacities. The total phenolic and flavonoid content were determined using colorimetric methods and the individual phenolic compounds were assessed by LC–MS/MS analysis. Quercetin hexoside was the dominant compound in L. aegaeus, particularly in methanol extract, while the ethyl acetate and methanol extracts of I. sempervirens were characterized by the presence scopoletin and hinic acid. The antioxidant abilities of the investigated extracts were tested using different assays including free radical scavenging, reducing power, phosphomolybdenum, and metal chelating. All the extracts showed strong antioxidant abilities. For both species, the ethyl acetate extracts were more potent against cholinesterases and α-amylase, while the methanol extracts were most active against α-glucosidase. Only the water extract, followed by methanol of I. sempervirens exhibited notable inhibitory activity against tyrosinase. In addition, the dominant compounds were docked against tyrosinase and α-glucosidase to investigate their predicted binding affinity and interactions with the active site. In conclusion, L. aegaeus and I. sempervirens showed potent biological attributes, which advocates for further studies to explore their potential use as phytopharmaceuticals.

Lotus aegaeus (Gris.) Boiss and Iberis sempervirens L.: Chemical fingerprints, antioxidant potential, and inhibition activities and docking on key enzymes linked to global health problems.

Mollica, Adriano;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Natural products are gaining much momentum worldwide because they have a broad spectrum of biological effects and present excellent opportunities for bioproducts development. With this fact, this study has been designed to investigate for the first time the effects of the ethyl acetate (EA), methanolic (MeOH), and water (W) extracts of Lotus aegaeus (La) and Iberis sempervirens (Is) on key enzymes as well as to quantify antioxidant capacities. The total phenolic and flavonoid content were determined using colorimetric methods and the individual phenolic compounds were assessed by LC–MS/MS analysis. Quercetin hexoside was the dominant compound in L. aegaeus, particularly in methanol extract, while the ethyl acetate and methanol extracts of I. sempervirens were characterized by the presence scopoletin and hinic acid. The antioxidant abilities of the investigated extracts were tested using different assays including free radical scavenging, reducing power, phosphomolybdenum, and metal chelating. All the extracts showed strong antioxidant abilities. For both species, the ethyl acetate extracts were more potent against cholinesterases and α-amylase, while the methanol extracts were most active against α-glucosidase. Only the water extract, followed by methanol of I. sempervirens exhibited notable inhibitory activity against tyrosinase. In addition, the dominant compounds were docked against tyrosinase and α-glucosidase to investigate their predicted binding affinity and interactions with the active site. In conclusion, L. aegaeus and I. sempervirens showed potent biological attributes, which advocates for further studies to explore their potential use as phytopharmaceuticals.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0926669018303674-main.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 978.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
978.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/693103
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact