Objective: It is unknown whether Omalizumab effectiveness changes over the course of time. Our retrospective real-life study tried to analyze whether Omalizumab response may be influenced by treatment duration. Methods: 340 severe asthmatics treated with Omalizumab for different periods of time were recruited. They were subdivided into 4 groups according to the Omalizumab treatment length: < 12, between 12 and 24, between 24 and 60 and > 60 months. Omalizumab treatment results (FEV1, exacerbations, ACT, SABA use, asthma control levels, medications used e and ICS doses) were compared. Results: ACT, exacerbations, GINA control levels, ICS doses and SABA use were similar in all groups with different Omalizumab treatment durations. Using a linear regression model, corrected for all confounding variables, a higher significant positive increase in FEV1% in subjects treated for 12-24 (beta= 9.49; p = 0.034) or 24-60 months (beta = 8.56; p = 0.043) was found when compared with subjects treated for a shorter period. Treatment duration was positively associated with a step down of the other associated therapies (OR: 1.013; p = 0.019). This association was more relevant (OR: 4.167; p = 0.005) when we considered Omalizumab treatment duration > 60 months compared to the shorter therapy. In particular, the percentage of subjects that were taking Montelukast, LABAs and oral corticosteroids was lower in the group treated with Omalizumab for a longer period of time. Conclusion: In real-life, the positive Omalizumab response remained stable for over 60 months. Long term Omalizumab treatment may lead to a discontinuation of some associated medications and to a slowing down of FEV1 decline.

Can the response to Omalizumab be influenced by treatment duration? A real-life study

Di Gioacchino M;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Objective: It is unknown whether Omalizumab effectiveness changes over the course of time. Our retrospective real-life study tried to analyze whether Omalizumab response may be influenced by treatment duration. Methods: 340 severe asthmatics treated with Omalizumab for different periods of time were recruited. They were subdivided into 4 groups according to the Omalizumab treatment length: < 12, between 12 and 24, between 24 and 60 and > 60 months. Omalizumab treatment results (FEV1, exacerbations, ACT, SABA use, asthma control levels, medications used e and ICS doses) were compared. Results: ACT, exacerbations, GINA control levels, ICS doses and SABA use were similar in all groups with different Omalizumab treatment durations. Using a linear regression model, corrected for all confounding variables, a higher significant positive increase in FEV1% in subjects treated for 12-24 (beta= 9.49; p = 0.034) or 24-60 months (beta = 8.56; p = 0.043) was found when compared with subjects treated for a shorter period. Treatment duration was positively associated with a step down of the other associated therapies (OR: 1.013; p = 0.019). This association was more relevant (OR: 4.167; p = 0.005) when we considered Omalizumab treatment duration > 60 months compared to the shorter therapy. In particular, the percentage of subjects that were taking Montelukast, LABAs and oral corticosteroids was lower in the group treated with Omalizumab for a longer period of time. Conclusion: In real-life, the positive Omalizumab response remained stable for over 60 months. Long term Omalizumab treatment may lead to a discontinuation of some associated medications and to a slowing down of FEV1 decline.
2017
Inglese
STAMPA
44
38
45
8
Effectiveness; Omalizumab; Real-life; Response; Severe asthma; Treatment duration; Acetates; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Omalizumab; Quinolines; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine; Biochemistry (medical); Pharmacology (medical)
http://www.elsevier.com/inca/publications/store/6/2/2/9/3/6/index.htt
no
63
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Sposato, B; Scalese, M; Latorre, M; Novelli, F; Scichilone, N; Milanese, M; Olivieri, C; Perrella, A; Paggiaro, P; Migliorini, Mg; Di Tomassi, M; Cami...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
reserved
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S109455391730041X-main.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 719.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
719.56 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/699617
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact