Objective To quantify the rate of perinatal mortality in monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancies, according to gestational age, and to ascertain the incidence of mortality in pregnancies managed as inpatients compared with those managed as outpatients. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched for studies on monoamniotic twin pregnancy. The primary outcomes explored were the incidence of intrauterine death (IUD), neonatal death (NND) and perinatal death (PND) in MCMA twins at different gestational-age windows (24-30, 31-32, 33-34, 35-36 and >= 37 weeks of gestation). The secondary outcomes were the incidence of IUD, NND and PND in MCMA twins according to the type of fetal monitoring (inpatient vs outpatient), and the incidence of delivery ahead of schedule. Random-effects model meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. Results Twenty-five studies (1628 non-anomalous twins reaching 24 weeks of gestation) were included. Single and double intrauterine deaths occurred in 2.5% (95% CI, 1.8-3.3%) and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.5-5.3%) of cases, respectively. IUD occurred in 4.3% (95% CI, 2.8-6.2%) of twins at 24-30weeks, in 1.0% (95% CI, 0.6-1.7%) at 31-32weeks and in 2.2% (95% CI, 0.9-3.9%) at 33-34 weeks of gestation, while there was no case of IUD, either single or double, from 35 weeks of gestation. In MCMA twin pregnancies managed mainly as inpatients, the incidence of IUD was 3.0% (95% CI, 1.4-5.2%), while the corresponding figure for those managed mainly as outpatients was 7.4% (95% CI, 4.4-11.1%). Finally, 37.8% (95% CI, 28.0-48.2%) of MCMA pregnancies were delivered before the scheduled time, due mainly to spontaneous preterm labor or abnormal cardiotocographic findings. Conclusions MCMA twins are at high risk of perinatal loss during the third trimester of pregnancy, with the large majority of such losses occurring as apparently unexpected events. Inpatient management seems to be associated with a lower rate of mortality, although further studies are needed in order to establish the appropriate type and timing of prenatal assessment in these pregnancies.

Perinatal mortality, timing of delivery and prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

D'Antonio F.;Buca D.;Liberati M.;
2019

Abstract

Objective To quantify the rate of perinatal mortality in monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancies, according to gestational age, and to ascertain the incidence of mortality in pregnancies managed as inpatients compared with those managed as outpatients. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched for studies on monoamniotic twin pregnancy. The primary outcomes explored were the incidence of intrauterine death (IUD), neonatal death (NND) and perinatal death (PND) in MCMA twins at different gestational-age windows (24-30, 31-32, 33-34, 35-36 and >= 37 weeks of gestation). The secondary outcomes were the incidence of IUD, NND and PND in MCMA twins according to the type of fetal monitoring (inpatient vs outpatient), and the incidence of delivery ahead of schedule. Random-effects model meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. Results Twenty-five studies (1628 non-anomalous twins reaching 24 weeks of gestation) were included. Single and double intrauterine deaths occurred in 2.5% (95% CI, 1.8-3.3%) and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.5-5.3%) of cases, respectively. IUD occurred in 4.3% (95% CI, 2.8-6.2%) of twins at 24-30weeks, in 1.0% (95% CI, 0.6-1.7%) at 31-32weeks and in 2.2% (95% CI, 0.9-3.9%) at 33-34 weeks of gestation, while there was no case of IUD, either single or double, from 35 weeks of gestation. In MCMA twin pregnancies managed mainly as inpatients, the incidence of IUD was 3.0% (95% CI, 1.4-5.2%), while the corresponding figure for those managed mainly as outpatients was 7.4% (95% CI, 4.4-11.1%). Finally, 37.8% (95% CI, 28.0-48.2%) of MCMA pregnancies were delivered before the scheduled time, due mainly to spontaneous preterm labor or abnormal cardiotocographic findings. Conclusions MCMA twins are at high risk of perinatal loss during the third trimester of pregnancy, with the large majority of such losses occurring as apparently unexpected events. Inpatient management seems to be associated with a lower rate of mortality, although further studies are needed in order to establish the appropriate type and timing of prenatal assessment in these pregnancies.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol_2019.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 1.02 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.02 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11564/706805
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact