Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

MEDLINE, Embase and Cinahl databases were searched. Studies reporting the occurrence of morbidity in twins affected compared with those not affected by birthweight discordance were included. The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity (including neurological, respiratory, infectious morbidities, abnormal acid-base status and necrotizing enterocolitis). The secondary outcomes were the individual morbidities. Sub-group analysis according to chorionicity, gestational age at birth and fetal weight (smaller vs larger twin) was also performed. Random-effect head-to-head meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Twenty studies (10 851 twin pregnancies) were included. The risk of composite morbidity was significantly higher in the pregnancies with birthweight discordance ≥15% (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.9), ≥20% (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.40-3.45), ≥25% (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.8-3.6), and ≥30% (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.2-3.2). In dichorionic twins, birthweight discordance ≥15% (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.65-3.46), ≥20% (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.8), ≥25% (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.1) and ≥30% (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.3-5.7) were all significantly associated with composite neonatal morbidity. Analysis of monochorionic twins was hampered by the very small number of included studies, which precluded adequate statistical power. Monochorionic twins with a birthweight discordance ≥20% were at significantly higher risk of composite neonatal morbidity (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.9) compared with those presenting with lesser degree of discordance. When stratifying the analysis according to gestational age at birth and fetal size, twins with birthweight discordance ≥15%, 20%, 25% and 30% delivered at ≥34 weeks were at higher risk of neonatal morbidity compared with controls, but there was no difference in the risk of morbidity between the larger and the smaller twin in the discordant pair.