This article deals with the issue of the relationship between public administration automat- ed decision making and the rule of law. It aims at demonstrating that there is a necessity to found administrative decision made by algorithmics on a clear legal mandate by the lawmakers rather than conceiving of it just as an organisational tool in the hands of beau- rocracy. This is also useful to overcome a sterile dispute between ‘humanity’ and ‘robotics’ sometimes surfacing in the case law as well. The exigent idea of the rule of law (principle of legality) here advocated, though, must be carefully tailored to meet the peculiar character- istics of the phenomenon to regulate.
Umano troppo umano. Decisioni amministrative automatizzate e principio di legalità
Stefano Civitarese Matteucci
2019-01-01
Abstract
This article deals with the issue of the relationship between public administration automat- ed decision making and the rule of law. It aims at demonstrating that there is a necessity to found administrative decision made by algorithmics on a clear legal mandate by the lawmakers rather than conceiving of it just as an organisational tool in the hands of beau- rocracy. This is also useful to overcome a sterile dispute between ‘humanity’ and ‘robotics’ sometimes surfacing in the case law as well. The exigent idea of the rule of law (principle of legality) here advocated, though, must be carefully tailored to meet the peculiar character- istics of the phenomenon to regulate.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1721-8985-28129-1.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Dimensione
390.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
390.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.