The notion that two theorems may be equivalent to each other is sometimes met with hesitation. In this article we tell a story that shows that there is something interesting and useful in this notion. We look at the following three results: Stirling’s formula, Wallis’ product formula, and the evaluation of the probability integral. The task of giving simple proofs of these results is the object of unabated attention. In order to enhance our understanding of these results, we show in a precise way that these results are indeed equivalent to each other.
Titolo: | Euler, Stirling, and Wallis: A Case Study in the Notion of Equivalence between Theorems |
Autori: | DI BIASE, FAUSTO (Corresponding) |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2019 |
Rivista: | |
Abstract: | The notion that two theorems may be equivalent to each other is sometimes met with hesitation. In this article we tell a story that shows that there is something interesting and useful in this notion. We look at the following three results: Stirling’s formula, Wallis’ product formula, and the evaluation of the probability integral. The task of giving simple proofs of these results is the object of unabated attention. In order to enhance our understanding of these results, we show in a precise way that these results are indeed equivalent to each other. |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11564/714093 |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-12-114EMS.pdf | articolo principale | Documento in Post-print | Open Access Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.