Background Angiogenesis has been recognized as the most important factor for tumor invasion, proliferation, and progression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, few clinical data are available regarding the efcacy of cabozantinib following immunotherapy. Objective To describe the outcome of cabozantinib in patients previously treated with immunotherapy. Patients and methods Patients with mRCC who received cabozantinib immediately after nivolumab were included. The primary endpoint was to assess the outcome in terms of efcacy and activity. Results Eighty-four mRCC patients met the criteria to be included in the fnal analysis. After a median follow-up of 9.4 months, median overall survival was 17.3 months. According to the IMDC criteria, the rates of patients alive at 12 months in the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups were 100%, 74%, and 33%, respectively (p<0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.5 months (95% CI 8.3–14.7); no diference was found based on duration of previous frst-line therapy or nivolumab PFS. The overall response rate was 52%, stable disease was found as the best response in 25.3% and progressive disease in 22.7% of patients. Among the 35 patients with progressive disease on nivolumab, 26 (74.3%) patients showed complete/partial response or stable disease with cabozantinib as best response after nivolumab. The major limitations of this study are the retrospective nature and the short follow-up. Conclusions Cabozantinib was shown to be efective and active in patients previously receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, cabozantinib can be considered a valid therapeutic option for previously treated mRCC patients, irrespective of the type and duration of prior therapies.

Cabozantinib After a Previous Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Analysis

De Tursi, Michele;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Background Angiogenesis has been recognized as the most important factor for tumor invasion, proliferation, and progression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, few clinical data are available regarding the efcacy of cabozantinib following immunotherapy. Objective To describe the outcome of cabozantinib in patients previously treated with immunotherapy. Patients and methods Patients with mRCC who received cabozantinib immediately after nivolumab were included. The primary endpoint was to assess the outcome in terms of efcacy and activity. Results Eighty-four mRCC patients met the criteria to be included in the fnal analysis. After a median follow-up of 9.4 months, median overall survival was 17.3 months. According to the IMDC criteria, the rates of patients alive at 12 months in the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups were 100%, 74%, and 33%, respectively (p<0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.5 months (95% CI 8.3–14.7); no diference was found based on duration of previous frst-line therapy or nivolumab PFS. The overall response rate was 52%, stable disease was found as the best response in 25.3% and progressive disease in 22.7% of patients. Among the 35 patients with progressive disease on nivolumab, 26 (74.3%) patients showed complete/partial response or stable disease with cabozantinib as best response after nivolumab. The major limitations of this study are the retrospective nature and the short follow-up. Conclusions Cabozantinib was shown to be efective and active in patients previously receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, cabozantinib can be considered a valid therapeutic option for previously treated mRCC patients, irrespective of the type and duration of prior therapies.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Iacovelli2020_Article_CabozantinibAfterAPreviousImmu.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Original Research
Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 759.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
759.82 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/726735
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact