Background: For many women, the need for multiple clinical visits is a barrier to medical abortion. Objectives: We assessed the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion completed at home versus routine clinic follow up after medical abortion. Search strategy: We searched databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL to find studies published in 1991–2018. Selection criteria: Eligible studies included women of reproductive age who had undergone a medical abortion that was completed at home. The intervention and self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion done by urine pregnancy tests kits by women at home was compared with routine medical follow up at a clinic. Data collection and analysis: Two researchers completed the study selection, data extraction, critical appraisal, and assessment of the evidence. The outcomes were successful complete abortions, side effects and complications, and acceptability. We performed meta-analyses when possible and GRADE to ascertain the certainty of the evidence. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017055316). Main results: Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs; n = 5493) met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis from all studies showed no significant difference in complete abortion rates between self-assessment and routine clinic follow up: RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99–1.01. The ongoing pregnancy rates were similar and the pooled results for the safety outcomes showed no significant differences between the groups. There was a significantly greater preference for self-assessment as the follow-up method. Conclusions: The effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion completed at home are not inferior to routine clinic follow up. Tweetable abstract: The effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion are not inferior to routine clinic follow up.

Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

D'Antonio F.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background: For many women, the need for multiple clinical visits is a barrier to medical abortion. Objectives: We assessed the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion completed at home versus routine clinic follow up after medical abortion. Search strategy: We searched databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL to find studies published in 1991–2018. Selection criteria: Eligible studies included women of reproductive age who had undergone a medical abortion that was completed at home. The intervention and self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion done by urine pregnancy tests kits by women at home was compared with routine medical follow up at a clinic. Data collection and analysis: Two researchers completed the study selection, data extraction, critical appraisal, and assessment of the evidence. The outcomes were successful complete abortions, side effects and complications, and acceptability. We performed meta-analyses when possible and GRADE to ascertain the certainty of the evidence. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017055316). Main results: Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs; n = 5493) met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis from all studies showed no significant difference in complete abortion rates between self-assessment and routine clinic follow up: RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99–1.01. The ongoing pregnancy rates were similar and the pooled results for the safety outcomes showed no significant differences between the groups. There was a significantly greater preference for self-assessment as the follow-up method. Conclusions: The effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion completed at home are not inferior to routine clinic follow up. Tweetable abstract: The effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion are not inferior to routine clinic follow up.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1471-0528.15922.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Systematic Review
Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 851.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
851.42 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/743491
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact