Almost ten years have elapsed since the start of evaluation activities in Italian academia. Some of these activities (ASN, VQR) have already accumulated the experience of more than one exercise, often with relevant repercussions for personal careers, educational programs and the distribution of resources to the structures that host training and research. In this period of time, academic psychology has been an active actor, sometimes showing internal cohesion and sharing, other times expressing the need for more articulation and differentiation, but never appearing unprepared towards the commitment represented by evaluation. The aim of this article is to understand, by looking at this relatively short past, whether among the many aspects of evaluation activities (in particular AVA, VQR, ASN and PRIN) some could be deemed fundamental, or should instead be changed to improve future practices and, more in particular, whether peculiarities of psychology evaluation are there that deserve special consideration in the dialogue with institutions and policymakers.

La valutazione della psicologia: Considerazioni su un decennio turbolento

Luca Tommasi
Primo
2020-01-01

Abstract

Almost ten years have elapsed since the start of evaluation activities in Italian academia. Some of these activities (ASN, VQR) have already accumulated the experience of more than one exercise, often with relevant repercussions for personal careers, educational programs and the distribution of resources to the structures that host training and research. In this period of time, academic psychology has been an active actor, sometimes showing internal cohesion and sharing, other times expressing the need for more articulation and differentiation, but never appearing unprepared towards the commitment represented by evaluation. The aim of this article is to understand, by looking at this relatively short past, whether among the many aspects of evaluation activities (in particular AVA, VQR, ASN and PRIN) some could be deemed fundamental, or should instead be changed to improve future practices and, more in particular, whether peculiarities of psychology evaluation are there that deserve special consideration in the dialogue with institutions and policymakers.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020GIP.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Dimensione 347.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
347.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/752943
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact