After the CLARITY-AD clinical trial results of lecanemab were interpreted as positive, and supporting the amyloid hypothesis, the drug received accelerated Food and Drug Administration approval. However, we argue that benefits of lecanemab treatment are uncertain and may yield net harm for some patients, and that the data do not support the amyloid hypothesis. We note potential biases from inclusion, unblinding, dropouts, and other issues. Given substantial adverse effects and subgroup heterogeneity, we conclude that lecanemab's efficacy is not clinically meaningful, consistent with numerous analyses suggesting that amyloid-beta and its derivatives are not the main causative agents of Alzheimer's disease dementia.
The Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibody Lecanemab: 16 Cautionary Notes
Sensi, Stefano L;
2023-01-01
Abstract
After the CLARITY-AD clinical trial results of lecanemab were interpreted as positive, and supporting the amyloid hypothesis, the drug received accelerated Food and Drug Administration approval. However, we argue that benefits of lecanemab treatment are uncertain and may yield net harm for some patients, and that the data do not support the amyloid hypothesis. We note potential biases from inclusion, unblinding, dropouts, and other issues. Given substantial adverse effects and subgroup heterogeneity, we conclude that lecanemab's efficacy is not clinically meaningful, consistent with numerous analyses suggesting that amyloid-beta and its derivatives are not the main causative agents of Alzheimer's disease dementia.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
lecanemab_subm.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Dimensione
357.43 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
357.43 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.