The recent proposal to include ‘meaning’ in the ISUF definition of urban morphology (Conzen, 2013) was followed by some discussion (Kropf and Malfroy, 2013). Since the structuralist approach to architecture (Eco, 1967) and to urban studies (Barthes, 1967) urban semiotics has developed into an almost autonomous discipline: in the presence of a large amount of literature, this topic cannot be left to sociological studies alone

New perspectives on the meaning of urban form

CAMIZ, Alessandro
2014-01-01

Abstract

The recent proposal to include ‘meaning’ in the ISUF definition of urban morphology (Conzen, 2013) was followed by some discussion (Kropf and Malfroy, 2013). Since the structuralist approach to architecture (Eco, 1967) and to urban studies (Barthes, 1967) urban semiotics has developed into an almost autonomous discipline: in the presence of a large amount of literature, this topic cannot be left to sociological studies alone
2014
9789729910159
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/825537
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact