Vittorio Sainati wrote two books and several articles on Aristotle's logical thought. In this paper I reconstruct Sainati's intepretation of Aristotle's logic. I show that Sainati anticipates some of the contributions by Michael Frede and Marko Malink I focus on two aspects: 1) Sainatis reconstruction of Aristotle's doctrine of the categories and 2) Sainatis claim that it is possible to make sense of Aristotle's necessity syllogistic if we believe that the necessity operator is used to express the necessity of the per se predications. I show that Sainatis idea that logical categories are nothing but predications has been further developed by M. Frede in a famous essay. Additionally, I show that Malink's interpretation of modal syllogistic against the backdrop of Aristotle's theory of predication echoes Sainatis contributions. My paper aims at showing the depth of Sainatis intepretation of Aristotle's logic.
L’Aristotele di Sainati e l’Aristotele dei contemporanei
Gili L.
2017-01-01
Abstract
Vittorio Sainati wrote two books and several articles on Aristotle's logical thought. In this paper I reconstruct Sainati's intepretation of Aristotle's logic. I show that Sainati anticipates some of the contributions by Michael Frede and Marko Malink I focus on two aspects: 1) Sainatis reconstruction of Aristotle's doctrine of the categories and 2) Sainatis claim that it is possible to make sense of Aristotle's necessity syllogistic if we believe that the necessity operator is used to express the necessity of the per se predications. I show that Sainatis idea that logical categories are nothing but predications has been further developed by M. Frede in a famous essay. Additionally, I show that Malink's interpretation of modal syllogistic against the backdrop of Aristotle's theory of predication echoes Sainatis contributions. My paper aims at showing the depth of Sainatis intepretation of Aristotle's logic.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
