Background: This study aims to identify a metabolomic signature that facilitates the classification of syncope and the categorization of the unexplained syncope (US) to aid in its management. Methods: We compared a control group (CTRL, n = 10) with a transient loss of consciousness (TLC) group divided into the OH group (n = 23) for orthostatic syncope, the NMS group (n = 26) for neuromediated syncope, the CS group (n = 9) for cardiological syncope, and the US group (n = 27) for US defined as syncope without a precise categorization after first- and second-level diagnostic approaches. Results: The CTRL and the TLC groups significantly differed in metabolic profile. A new logistic regression model has been developed to predict how the US will be clustered. Using differences in lysophosphatidylcholine with 22 carbon atom (C22:0-LPC) levels, 96% of the US belongs to the NMS and 4% to the CS subgroup. Differences in glutamine and lysine (GLN/LYS) levels clustered 95% of the US in the NMS and 5% in the CS subgroup. Conclusions: We hypothesize a possible role of C22:0 LPC and GLN/LYS in re-classifying US and differentiating it from cardiological syncope.

A Metabolomic Approach to Unexplained Syncope

Cicalini, Ilaria;Pieragostino, Damiana;De Laurenzi, Vincenzo;Federici, Massimo
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background: This study aims to identify a metabolomic signature that facilitates the classification of syncope and the categorization of the unexplained syncope (US) to aid in its management. Methods: We compared a control group (CTRL, n = 10) with a transient loss of consciousness (TLC) group divided into the OH group (n = 23) for orthostatic syncope, the NMS group (n = 26) for neuromediated syncope, the CS group (n = 9) for cardiological syncope, and the US group (n = 27) for US defined as syncope without a precise categorization after first- and second-level diagnostic approaches. Results: The CTRL and the TLC groups significantly differed in metabolic profile. A new logistic regression model has been developed to predict how the US will be clustered. Using differences in lysophosphatidylcholine with 22 carbon atom (C22:0-LPC) levels, 96% of the US belongs to the NMS and 4% to the CS subgroup. Differences in glutamine and lysine (GLN/LYS) levels clustered 95% of the US in the NMS and 5% in the CS subgroup. Conclusions: We hypothesize a possible role of C22:0 LPC and GLN/LYS in re-classifying US and differentiating it from cardiological syncope.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2024-biomedicines-12-02641.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: 2024-Biomedicines-12-02641
Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 8.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.59 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/844513
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact