Objectives: We present two clinical cases of association between symptomatic free-floating thrombus (FFT) in thoracic aorta and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: In the first patient, we observed a recent onset of peripheral and visceral signs of embolization: after a first treatment with anticoagulation, our Aortic team scheduled the coverage of FFT (sited in zone 1 of the aortic arch) with an anatomical debranching of anonymous trunk and left carotid artery, a left carotid-subclavian bypass, and a TEVAR of the aortic arch with proximal landing in zone 0 of the arch. The second case was characterized by chest pain, left upper limb ischemia, and CTA evidence of an FFT in zone 3 of the aortic arch; we planned a chimney-TEVAR on the left subclavian artery and descending thoracic aorta (with proximal landing in zone 2 of the aortic arch) to exclude the FFT. Results: No complications resulted and no new embolic episodes were registered. Conclusions: Evaluating the aorta is warranted in all patients with peripheral emboli of uncertain pathogenesis. In our opinion, the endovascular treatment of a symptomatic FFT could represent an effective and safe solution in a patient fit for endovascular surgery, but larger studies are required to define a personalized treatment strategy.
Endovascular solutions for symptomatic free-floating thrombus in thoracic aorta in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Two clinical cases
Mastrangelo, G;Di Sebastiano, P;
2024-01-01
Abstract
Objectives: We present two clinical cases of association between symptomatic free-floating thrombus (FFT) in thoracic aorta and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: In the first patient, we observed a recent onset of peripheral and visceral signs of embolization: after a first treatment with anticoagulation, our Aortic team scheduled the coverage of FFT (sited in zone 1 of the aortic arch) with an anatomical debranching of anonymous trunk and left carotid artery, a left carotid-subclavian bypass, and a TEVAR of the aortic arch with proximal landing in zone 0 of the arch. The second case was characterized by chest pain, left upper limb ischemia, and CTA evidence of an FFT in zone 3 of the aortic arch; we planned a chimney-TEVAR on the left subclavian artery and descending thoracic aorta (with proximal landing in zone 2 of the aortic arch) to exclude the FFT. Results: No complications resulted and no new embolic episodes were registered. Conclusions: Evaluating the aorta is warranted in all patients with peripheral emboli of uncertain pathogenesis. In our opinion, the endovascular treatment of a symptomatic FFT could represent an effective and safe solution in a patient fit for endovascular surgery, but larger studies are required to define a personalized treatment strategy.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


