This article examines the main testimonia that feature sections of the νόμος πυθικός (Strab. 9.3.10; Poll. 4.84; Schol. vet. Pind. P. inscr. a) and another, often neglected, but equally important attestation of this νόμος (Demetr.Lac. De poem. 2.52 Romeo). The paper explores the differences between these sources and their impact on the performative modality of the νόμος πυθικός. In the concluding part, the article links the section ἴαμβοι καὶ δάκτυλοι present in Strabo (ἐπιπαιωνισμός) and the assertions attributed to Heraclides Ponticus by Athenaeus (fr. 158 Wehrli ap. Ath. 15.701e–f), proposing a new re-construction of Athenaeus’ text.

Il νόμος πυθικός e la sua esecuzione: una rilettura delle fonti antiche

Serena Napoleone
2025-01-01

Abstract

This article examines the main testimonia that feature sections of the νόμος πυθικός (Strab. 9.3.10; Poll. 4.84; Schol. vet. Pind. P. inscr. a) and another, often neglected, but equally important attestation of this νόμος (Demetr.Lac. De poem. 2.52 Romeo). The paper explores the differences between these sources and their impact on the performative modality of the νόμος πυθικός. In the concluding part, the article links the section ἴαμβοι καὶ δάκτυλοι present in Strabo (ἐπιπαιωνισμός) and the assertions attributed to Heraclides Ponticus by Athenaeus (fr. 158 Wehrli ap. Ath. 15.701e–f), proposing a new re-construction of Athenaeus’ text.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
grms-article-10.1163-22129758-bja10096.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 446.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
446.03 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/853713
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact