This article expounds on the findings of European-financed research concerning how different States grappled with the socioeconomic consequences of the pandemic and to what extent one can envisage non-marginal institutional and policy change towards the post-pandemic phase. The article investigates any connection between what the States are promising and the social impact of the COVID-19 crisis, appraising the general orientation of social policy reform in terms of institutional design and ‘philosophical’ inspiration. By the latter, we mean a social rights-based approach and an active social policy approach, also termed social investment. Therefore, rather than only seeing how policies impact the socioeconomic situation, we also detect how the socioeconomic situation impacts the general political response. To this end, the article analyses a set of national jurisdictions against the backdrop of a piece of supranational legislation, such as the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), intended to bring about essential change. The approach is interdisciplinary, involving legal and sociological analysis, and uses much reliable information to chart specific policy patterns valuable for decision-makers.

Managing Post-Pandemic Recovery. The normalisation of emergency socio-economic measures in different European [constitutional] landscapes

Stefano Civitarese
;
Virginia Campigli;Alfredo Cartone;Melania D’Angelosante;Gianlorenzo Ioannides;Mara Maretti
2025-01-01

Abstract

This article expounds on the findings of European-financed research concerning how different States grappled with the socioeconomic consequences of the pandemic and to what extent one can envisage non-marginal institutional and policy change towards the post-pandemic phase. The article investigates any connection between what the States are promising and the social impact of the COVID-19 crisis, appraising the general orientation of social policy reform in terms of institutional design and ‘philosophical’ inspiration. By the latter, we mean a social rights-based approach and an active social policy approach, also termed social investment. Therefore, rather than only seeing how policies impact the socioeconomic situation, we also detect how the socioeconomic situation impacts the general political response. To this end, the article analyses a set of national jurisdictions against the backdrop of a piece of supranational legislation, such as the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), intended to bring about essential change. The approach is interdisciplinary, involving legal and sociological analysis, and uses much reliable information to chart specific policy patterns valuable for decision-makers.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/868595
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact