Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is common in women and negatively affects quality of life. Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is effective, most studies have focused on isolated muscle contractions. Less is known about multimodal programs integrating posture, breathing, and intra-abdominal pressure management. This study examined how urinary loss (UL) and moderate physical activity (MPA), measured objectively, relate to perceived pelvic floor disorders after a five-week multimodal intervention. Methods: Twenty women (40–70 years) with UI participated in three weekly 60 min sessions for five weeks. Outcomes were assessed before and after the intervention: UL using the pad test, physical activity with a wrist-worn accelerometer, and pelvic floor disorders with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests and regression models were used to analyze changes and associations between variables. Results: UL significantly decreased after treatment (p < 0.001) as did total PFDI-20 (p = 0.007). Before treatment, PFDI-20 was mainly predicted by MPA (β = −0.537, p = 0.013). After treatment, UL became the strongest predictor of PFDI-20 (β = 0.587, p = 0.008) while Δ analyses confirmed that changes in both UL (β = 0.444, p = 0.026) and MPA (β = −0.461, p = 0.021) predicted improvements in perceived pelvic floor disorders. Conclusions: A five-week multimodal program reduced UL and improved perceived pelvic floor disorders. After treatment, symptoms were more strongly related to UL than to MPA. This study suggests that a multimodal exercise approach may represent a feasible and potentially effective option for improving both objectively measured urinary loss and perceived pelvic floor symptoms.

Effects of a Multimodal Training Program for the Management of Urinary Incontinence and Physical Activity Levels on Symptom Perception and Urine Loss

Prestanti, Iris
Primo
;
Serafini, Sofia
Secondo
;
Di Rocco, Francesca;Fusco, Andrea;Izzicupo, Pascal
Penultimo
;
Di Baldassarre, Angela
Ultimo
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is common in women and negatively affects quality of life. Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is effective, most studies have focused on isolated muscle contractions. Less is known about multimodal programs integrating posture, breathing, and intra-abdominal pressure management. This study examined how urinary loss (UL) and moderate physical activity (MPA), measured objectively, relate to perceived pelvic floor disorders after a five-week multimodal intervention. Methods: Twenty women (40–70 years) with UI participated in three weekly 60 min sessions for five weeks. Outcomes were assessed before and after the intervention: UL using the pad test, physical activity with a wrist-worn accelerometer, and pelvic floor disorders with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests and regression models were used to analyze changes and associations between variables. Results: UL significantly decreased after treatment (p < 0.001) as did total PFDI-20 (p = 0.007). Before treatment, PFDI-20 was mainly predicted by MPA (β = −0.537, p = 0.013). After treatment, UL became the strongest predictor of PFDI-20 (β = 0.587, p = 0.008) while Δ analyses confirmed that changes in both UL (β = 0.444, p = 0.026) and MPA (β = −0.461, p = 0.021) predicted improvements in perceived pelvic floor disorders. Conclusions: A five-week multimodal program reduced UL and improved perceived pelvic floor disorders. After treatment, symptoms were more strongly related to UL than to MPA. This study suggests that a multimodal exercise approach may represent a feasible and potentially effective option for improving both objectively measured urinary loss and perceived pelvic floor symptoms.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/871153
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact