Background: Optimal pain control with limited muscle weakness after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is paramount for a swift initiation of physical therapy and ambulation, thus expediting hospital discharge. FICB (Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block) has been recommended because it offers pain control with a low risk of motor block. PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) block with LFCN (Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve) has been proposed as an alternative that offers comparable pain control with a lower risk of motor block; however, evidence is limited. We aimed to investigate the degree of muscle weakness and pain control with PENG + LFCN. Methods: Patients undergoing elective THA from November 2022 to October 2023 have been retrospectively analyzed. The degree of quadriceps femoris muscle paresis was assessed with the MRC scale at 6 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes: NRS score at 6, 12, and 24 h, total opioid consumption, and time to first rescue opioid. Results: In total, 80 patients were included in the study, 57 received PENG + LFCN, and the remaining 23 received FICB. PENG + LCFN resulted in a higher MRC at 6 h (4 [4; 5] vs. 3 [2; 4] p = 0.0001) and better pain control (mean difference [95% CI] at 6 h, 0.93 [0.14; 1.72], at 12 h, 0.47 [−0.49; 1.43], and at 24 h, 0.39 [0.25; 1.2], p = 0.0006). Less PRN opioids were requested in the PENG + LFCN vs. FICB groups (7.5 [0; 15] MME vs. 60 [40; 80], p = 0.001). Conclusions: PENG + LFCN was associated with less muscle weakness, better pain control, and less rescue opioids in patients undergoing elective THA. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm this finding.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Plus Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block vs. Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Hip Replacement Surgery

Vetrugno, Luigi;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Optimal pain control with limited muscle weakness after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is paramount for a swift initiation of physical therapy and ambulation, thus expediting hospital discharge. FICB (Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block) has been recommended because it offers pain control with a low risk of motor block. PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) block with LFCN (Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve) has been proposed as an alternative that offers comparable pain control with a lower risk of motor block; however, evidence is limited. We aimed to investigate the degree of muscle weakness and pain control with PENG + LFCN. Methods: Patients undergoing elective THA from November 2022 to October 2023 have been retrospectively analyzed. The degree of quadriceps femoris muscle paresis was assessed with the MRC scale at 6 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes: NRS score at 6, 12, and 24 h, total opioid consumption, and time to first rescue opioid. Results: In total, 80 patients were included in the study, 57 received PENG + LFCN, and the remaining 23 received FICB. PENG + LCFN resulted in a higher MRC at 6 h (4 [4; 5] vs. 3 [2; 4] p = 0.0001) and better pain control (mean difference [95% CI] at 6 h, 0.93 [0.14; 1.72], at 12 h, 0.47 [−0.49; 1.43], and at 24 h, 0.39 [0.25; 1.2], p = 0.0006). Less PRN opioids were requested in the PENG + LFCN vs. FICB groups (7.5 [0; 15] MME vs. 60 [40; 80], p = 0.001). Conclusions: PENG + LFCN was associated with less muscle weakness, better pain control, and less rescue opioids in patients undergoing elective THA. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm this finding.
2025
Inglese
14
3
hip replacement; locoregional anesthesia; opioids; pain; postoperative recovery; ultrasound
10
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Vetrone, Francesco; Saglietti, Francesco; Galimberti, Andrea; Pezzi, Angelo; Umbrello, Michele; Cuttone, Giuseppe; La Via, Luigi; Vetrugno, Luigi; Dea...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/875703
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact