This article argues that enactivism, integrated with feminist and posthumanist perspectives, provides a unified framework for addressing both the ecological crisis and the ethical challenges posed by artificial intelligence. Current debates—from the Anthropocene to human-centered AI—call for a critical redefinition of the human, yet they often evolve in parallel, producing a “split gaze” that neglects the profound hybridization of humans, environments, and technologies. With its relational understanding of cognition, sense-making, and agency, enactivism offers conceptual tools for overcoming the human versus Nature dualism as well as the human versus machine dualism. By reassessing intelligence as embodied, emergent, and environmentally embedded, it enables a shift toward relational ecological ethics grounded in interdependence and care. Applied to AI, this perspective treats digital technologies as components of an evolving human niche rather than external tools, thereby reframing responsibility in terms of socio-material practices rather than abstract principles. The article concludes by proposing a “networked humanity” and an “ecologically expansive community” as guiding concepts for multispecies and technological coexistence.

Networked Humanity. An Enactivist Paradigm for Aligning Humans, Nonhumans, and Machines

Achella, S
2026-01-01

Abstract

This article argues that enactivism, integrated with feminist and posthumanist perspectives, provides a unified framework for addressing both the ecological crisis and the ethical challenges posed by artificial intelligence. Current debates—from the Anthropocene to human-centered AI—call for a critical redefinition of the human, yet they often evolve in parallel, producing a “split gaze” that neglects the profound hybridization of humans, environments, and technologies. With its relational understanding of cognition, sense-making, and agency, enactivism offers conceptual tools for overcoming the human versus Nature dualism as well as the human versus machine dualism. By reassessing intelligence as embodied, emergent, and environmentally embedded, it enables a shift toward relational ecological ethics grounded in interdependence and care. Applied to AI, this perspective treats digital technologies as components of an evolving human niche rather than external tools, thereby reframing responsibility in terms of socio-material practices rather than abstract principles. The article concludes by proposing a “networked humanity” and an “ecologically expansive community” as guiding concepts for multispecies and technological coexistence.
2026
Inglese
ELETTRONICO
Humanistic Anthropology Humanitiy and Technology Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence Posthumanism Transhumanism Philosophy of Technology
Goal 4: Quality education
Goal 10: Reduced inequalities
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-025-10354-6#citeas
no
1
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Achella, S
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
   Digital transition and human values
   Digit-Human
   M.U.R. - Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
   P2022X5MSS
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/877518
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact