Advanced artificial intelligence models for skin lesion classification often suffer from performance disparities when applied to images of patients with darker skin tones, largely due to underrepresentation of dark skin tone images in training datasets. In this study, we investigate this issue by evaluating a previously proposed explainable framework, MultiExCAM, trained on the widely used ISIC2018 dataset. We test its performance on Pipsqueak, a previously proposed dataset composed by skin lesion images on dark skin tones. As expected, we observe a significant drop in classification performance when the model is applied to Pipsqueak. To better understand the source of these failures, we employ explainable artificial intelligence techniques to visualize and analyze the model’s decision-making process on both datasets. Our results highlight clear differences in attention patterns and decision rationale, revealing how the lack of dark skin tone representation in the training data leads to poor generalization and biased behavior. This work emphasizes the critical role of explainable analysis in exposing and understanding model bias in clinical applications, and the necessity of inclusive datasets for fair and reliable skin lesion classification.

Underrepresentation of Dark Skin Tone in Skin Lesion Datasets: The Role of the Explainable Techniques in Assessing the Bias

Luciano Caroprese
2026-01-01

Abstract

Advanced artificial intelligence models for skin lesion classification often suffer from performance disparities when applied to images of patients with darker skin tones, largely due to underrepresentation of dark skin tone images in training datasets. In this study, we investigate this issue by evaluating a previously proposed explainable framework, MultiExCAM, trained on the widely used ISIC2018 dataset. We test its performance on Pipsqueak, a previously proposed dataset composed by skin lesion images on dark skin tones. As expected, we observe a significant drop in classification performance when the model is applied to Pipsqueak. To better understand the source of these failures, we employ explainable artificial intelligence techniques to visualize and analyze the model’s decision-making process on both datasets. Our results highlight clear differences in attention patterns and decision rationale, revealing how the lack of dark skin tone representation in the training data leads to poor generalization and biased behavior. This work emphasizes the critical role of explainable analysis in exposing and understanding model bias in clinical applications, and the necessity of inclusive datasets for fair and reliable skin lesion classification.
2026
Communications in Computer and Information Science
Inglese
Short papers, Doctoral Consortium and workshop papers which were presented at the 29th European Conference on New Trends in Databases and Information Systems, ADBIS 2025
2025
fin
2676
446
456
11
9783032057266
9783032057273
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Dataset Bias; Explainable AI; Melanoma Classification; Skin Tone Diversity
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
no
none
Ruga, Tommaso; Zumpano, Ester; Vocaturo, Eugenio; Caroprese, Luciano
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
4
4 Contributo in Atti di Convegno (Proceeding)::4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/886413
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact