Objective: To investigate the association between male factor infertility and openness to discussing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment with levels of depression among men undergoing infertility treatment. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Three hundred forty participants (170 men and their partners) undergoing ART treatments. Intervention(s): Administration of a set of questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s): Depressive symptoms were detected by means of the Zung Depression Self-Rating Scale. Participants' willingness to share their infertility treatment experience with other people was assessed by means of self-report questionnaires. Result(s): In this study, 51.8% of males chose not to discuss their ART treatments with people other than their partner. In addition, the decision to discuss or not discuss the ART treatments with others was significantly associated with men's depressive symptoms. Male factor infertility was significantly associated with depression when considered together with the decision not to discuss ART treatments with others. A general disposition characterized by a lack of openness with others seemed to be a significant predictor of depression. Conclusion(s): There is a need for routine fertility care to pay greater attention to men's emotional needs. Before commencing reproductive treatment, male patients may benefit from undergoing routine screening for variables (i.e., male factor infertility and openness to others about ART) that may affect their risk of depression.

Male factor infertility and lack of openness about infertility as risk factors for depressive symptoms in males undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment in Italy

BABORE, ALESSANDRA
Primo
;
STUPPIA, Liborio;TRUMELLO, CARMEN;CANDELORI, CARLA;ANTONUCCI, IVANA
2017-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between male factor infertility and openness to discussing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment with levels of depression among men undergoing infertility treatment. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Three hundred forty participants (170 men and their partners) undergoing ART treatments. Intervention(s): Administration of a set of questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s): Depressive symptoms were detected by means of the Zung Depression Self-Rating Scale. Participants' willingness to share their infertility treatment experience with other people was assessed by means of self-report questionnaires. Result(s): In this study, 51.8% of males chose not to discuss their ART treatments with people other than their partner. In addition, the decision to discuss or not discuss the ART treatments with others was significantly associated with men's depressive symptoms. Male factor infertility was significantly associated with depression when considered together with the decision not to discuss ART treatments with others. A general disposition characterized by a lack of openness with others seemed to be a significant predictor of depression. Conclusion(s): There is a need for routine fertility care to pay greater attention to men's emotional needs. Before commencing reproductive treatment, male patients may benefit from undergoing routine screening for variables (i.e., male factor infertility and openness to others about ART) that may affect their risk of depression.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Babore et al., 2017 Fertility and Sterility published.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Articolo Full Text
Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Dimensione 323.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
323.99 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Manuscript revised Fertility and Sterility.pdf

Open Access dal 01/01/2020

Descrizione: Post-print dell'autore
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Dimensione 319.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
319.67 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11564/664500
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact