Background: To compare feasibility andeffectiveness of absorbable and non-absorbable mesh fixation techniques inlaparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair. Methods: A PubMed Embase, Google Scholarsystematic review was carried out. Primary and secondary endpoints wereconsidered. Odds ratio (OR) for each item was pooled and no bias according toQUADAS-2 tool and funnel plot asymmetry test were found. Results: Five randomized controlled trials,including 1,091 patients, were enrolled. There was no difference between thetwo techniques in terms of postoperative morbidity (OR: 1.03, P=0.910), seromas(OR: 0.77, P=0.520), adhesion formations (OR: 0.49, P=0.560) and chronic pain(OR: 0.81, P=0.260). Risk of recurrence was significantly higher in theabsorbable group (OR: 1.67, P<0.001). Conclusions: The adoption ofabsorbable or non-absorbable tack techniques does not influence patients’outcome. However, non-absorbable devices should be selected in high risk ofrecurrence cases.
Laparoscopic approach to ventral incisional hernia: absorbable or non-absorbable tacks? - a meta-analysis
Mirko Barone
;Paolo Raimondi
;Francesco Caldaralo
;Annadomenica Cichella
;Giuseppe Cipollone
;Roberto Cotellese
;Felice Mucilli
;Paolo Innocenti
;
2018-01-01
Abstract
Background: To compare feasibility andeffectiveness of absorbable and non-absorbable mesh fixation techniques inlaparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair. Methods: A PubMed Embase, Google Scholarsystematic review was carried out. Primary and secondary endpoints wereconsidered. Odds ratio (OR) for each item was pooled and no bias according toQUADAS-2 tool and funnel plot asymmetry test were found. Results: Five randomized controlled trials,including 1,091 patients, were enrolled. There was no difference between thetwo techniques in terms of postoperative morbidity (OR: 1.03, P=0.910), seromas(OR: 0.77, P=0.520), adhesion formations (OR: 0.49, P=0.560) and chronic pain(OR: 0.81, P=0.260). Risk of recurrence was significantly higher in theabsorbable group (OR: 1.67, P<0.001). Conclusions: The adoption ofabsorbable or non-absorbable tack techniques does not influence patients’outcome. However, non-absorbable devices should be selected in high risk ofrecurrence cases.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
4798-PB1-7374-R1.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Dimensione
804.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
804.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.